-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 17, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Rick Zeman wrote:
> What about putting the Maia/postfix box in the DMZ,
have the
> firwall NOT accept mail, but rather forward all port 25
traffic to
> that box and let it, with the proper recipient
verification, accept
> and reject mail? Problems all solved.
>
More to the point, a firewall should not be handling any
protocols or
doing filtering within those, it should stay on a lower
layer of the
network stack. It would be impossible for a firewall to
keep up with
all possible protocols and applications. Leave the
application
security to the application layer.
If you are depending on a "firewall" to enforce
application security,
you have a major security problem - a firewall is not really
much
security at all. It's just a small lock on the front door.
OTOH, a properly configured and maintained server can live
on the
outside without a firewall without any security risk.
The proper thing for a firewall to do, is to forward
requests on to
the proper server for only the advertised services, and
block
everything else. It should not in any way alter or handle
the
traffic itself, but merely make sure traffic is limited to
the proper
channels.
I know that the postfix mailing list was at one time (and
maybe still
is?) annoyed with several firewall products like this that
interfere
with proper email flow. I think you'll find the same advice
there,
but with a touch more venom directed at these firewalls...
;)
David Morton
Maia Mailguard http://www.maiamailguard
.com
mortonda dgrmm.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGxcc4Uy30ODPkzl0RAoC7AKDU+Pv6Z8mPp1vcRcrByitK1eDesACg
h4Mm
58NJ0PgPEE0zLqwybSjXiGg=
=+qk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-users renaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
|