Hello Albrecht,
Yes I can confirm your recollection that the resource name
was meant to
be decimal. Your suggestion seems OK to me as it would
rather add values
than remove values. I'll submit a TD from the Rapporteur to
make sure
this is considered.
Regards, Christian
Albrecht.Schwarz alcatel-lucent.de wrote:
> This is a valid point in my opinion and an IMG item.
> I believe that the intention was not to use hex numbers
in the text
> identifier and the resource name, we had rather decimal
numbers in mind as
> far as I remember.
>
> Given that, my suggestion is to change in the last
table row
> 1st column: "Extension resource 20" by
"Extension resource 32", and
> 2nd column: "ext20" by "ext32".
>
> Christian, could we tackle this next week as an IMG
item?
>
> -Albrecht
>
>
>
>
>
> "Arvind
> Charanyan" To:
<megacoietf.org>
> <arvind.charanya cc:
> nccpu.com>
Subject: [Megaco] Number of Extension Resources in Detailed
Congestion Reporting
> Package
> 07.03.2007 12:56
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In the case of the Detailed Congestion Reporting
Package (DCR), the
> resource names and IDs are as given below ?
>
>
> Table 1/H.248.32 ? Resource Names
>
>
> |----------------------------------------+
----|
> | Resource Name: |
PropertyID / | |
> | |
EnumerationValue | |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> | |Text
Identifier |Bina|
> | |
|ry |
> | |
|Iden|
> | |
|tifi|
> | |
|er |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |General Resources |gen
|0x00|
> | |
|01 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |DSP Resources |dsp
|0x00|
> | |
|02 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |IP Resources |ip
|0x00|
> | |
|03 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |ATM Resources |atm
|0x00|
> | |
|04 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |Reserved |
|0x00|
> | |
|05 ?|
> | |
|0x00|
> | |
|20 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |Extension Resource 1 |ext1
|0x00|
> | |
|21 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |Extension Resource 2 |ext2
|0x00|
> | |
|22 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> | |?
| |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
> |Extension Resource 20 |ext20
|0x00|
> | |
|40 |
>
|----------------------------------------+------------------
---------+----|
>
>
>
> The Extension Resources are from 1 to 20 as given in
the table. Does that
> mean there are 32 Extension Resources (from
ext1?.extA?ext10?.ext1F till
> ext20)?
>
> Or does that mean that the number of extension
resources is 20, though
> their Binary ID is in Hexadecimal?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Arvind
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> Megacoietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> Megacoietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
Megacoietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
|
