|
Hello,
Could you please tell us whether our understanding of xal/las is right?
In our scenario, MGC send "SG{xal/las}" to calling side to indicate that the called side answer the call and local charging should start.
During the call is ongoing, MGC send "SG{amet/em}" for the charging pulse purpose, but the signal "xal/las" is not included.
According H248.1, however, "a new signal should replace the former signal on MG", so the calling side MG will replace "xal/las" with signal "amet/em", so MG lost signal "xal/las" and it indicates that called side onhook the call and the charging finished.
It is right?
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Xu Jian
|