Paramahamsa Tewari is known in the 'free energy' community as
one of the pioneers of over-unity energy production. His Space
Power Generator is one of the early examples of
electromagnetic generators that are said to produce more energy than they should
- according to agreed-upon theoretical considerations.
Paramahamsa Tewari
Tewari is also the originator of Space Vortex
Theory, which holds that space is permeated by a non material
substrate that, similar to a Bose-
Einstein condensate, has high density but no inherent
resistance to flow, and that matter is created by vortices in that substrate
that break its continuity due to their flow at the speed of light. His views are
described in the paper titled "On the Space-Vortex Structure of the
Electron" (download as PDF).
In the following article, Paramahamsa Tewari discusses how
this view of the genesis of matter is applicable to cosmic structures as well:
The Hidden Laws in the
Universe
ptewari1  sancharnet .in">Paramahamsa Tewari
Can we understand the universal reality in a scientific sense
and describe it through scientific methods? Taking due note of the theories and
experimental findings during the last few centuries and paying attention to the
fact that some basic issues like genesis of mass, inertia, charge and light
require a fresh approach for their fuller understanding, universal reality
can be pinpointed. Among the aforesaid basic properties of matter,
genesis of mass is the least understood phenomenon.
The present problems in physics arise mainly due
to the unresolved controversy whether, in addition to matter and field, the
universe has also a basic substratum of some real entity. For instance, to study
the mode of transmission of light in the substratum of either ether, or
voidness, requires first to determine the structural relationship between light
and the substratum transmitting it.
A: Is light in its structure independent of space structure
as it would be if space were postulated as a void?
B: Or is light structurally a condition of space (ether) as it would
be if a fluid ether were postulated?
But before that, if ether's existence as
the universal substratum is postulated, it has to function not only as a carrier
of light but also - and more primarily - as the entity to give structure to
matter, say the electron. This is because light is not as basic a
phenomenon as matter which has more basic properties including
mass, inertia, charge etc.
- - -
Starting first with the postulate of real existence of
an ether substratum, the question arises: Since the electron has mass, can we
postulate mass and density properties for the ether as well? The answer is a
clear 'No' -
if the origin of mass in electron structure is to be derived
from First Principles. But, if ether is postulated to
be a mass-less fluid substratum, it is branded as a
hypothetical entity because the modern trend is that anything without mass is
energy-less and hence a kind of nothingness. Here
is the impasse created for the past century by the relativity and quantum
theories. With an empty and also non-empty concept of space
;
(to suit convenience)
;
they do not allow investigation of the genesis of
mass from the first principles. The challenge is to derive mass
and charge properties of the electron through the dynamics of a
mass-less ether using new basic equations, and to compare the
theoretically obtained results with the experimentally obtained values of
electron mass and charge, and thus to prove the real existence of a non material
ether substratum, unless of course any other contemporary theories based on the
postulate of a void-space can achieve the same. Further, it is not only to
explain the origin of the basic properties of mass, inertia and charge of the
electron and of matter in general but also to explain, in qualitative and
quantitative terms, the creation of electrostatic, gravitational, magnetic and
electromagnetic fields from electron structure for a broader and clearer
understanding of the existence of fields and matter in the universe.
Einstein argued around the middle of the 20th
century that 'field' is the most fundamental entity in the universe, but leaving
the question of the process of creation of fields open, his can be termed a
hasty conclusion. Also, he said that since we can not do away with the concept
of fields, why introduce a hypothetical carrier - ether - for the transmission
of fields. With this suggestion, again he did not give due importance to the
genesis of fields because fields, if real, will require a real substratum.
Postulates
Proceeding according to the guidelines
from the above principles and ensuring physical picture and mechanistic
classical approach for each phenomenon, the following postulates were made in
Space Vortex Theory (SVT) by the writer:
1: The universe has only one reality of three dimensional
fluid space with non material properties (mass less, non viscous, continuous,
incompressible, homogeneous fluid).
2: The fluid space has a limiting
velocity gradient at which its circulating flow breaks down.
3: Circulating motion is an inherent property of
universal space.
Creation of
electron
The nonmaterial space (here after termed "space')
in vortex circulation at the limiting velocity-gradient breaks down into a
dynamically stable sphere of void, thus creating an electron.
Fig. 1 shows that the electron center with an
axis of rotation is an ultra small sphere of nothingness, containing no field,
no energy, no space ---
and instead is a sphere of a void of fixed
radius. Beyond this sphere of void
(enclosed within the spinning interface,
hereafter called ¡°interface¡±),
space as a non material fluid exists
almost infinitely as the most basic substratum of the universe.
It has been shown (SVT) that the mass of the
electron is proportional to the product of the volume of the void within the
interface and the maximum circulation speed of space (equal to the speed of
light c relative to space) on the interface, and the charge of the electron is
proportional to the product of the surface of the spinning interface and maximum
speed of space circulation on the interface. From these two basic equations,
mass and charge of the electron as well as all the stable particles and cosmic
bodies
(planets, stars, galactic cores) are
derivable.
Further, it follows from the postulates that the
electron is the only fundamental particle in the universe. An electron vortex in
opposing rotation is a positron (Fig. 2). This explains that positive and
negative charges are rotation based.
New
Equations
me = ( 4 ¦Ğ re
3 / 3) c
where me is electron mass,
re is the radius of electron¡¯s interface and c is the maximum speed
of circulation of fluid space.
qe = (¦Ğ / 4) (4 ¦Ğ
re 2 ) c
where qe is the electron charge.
Fields in the structure of
Electron / Nucleus / Atoms
In electron vortex, the velocity field (velocity
of space points on a streamline)
falls inversely as the distance from the vortex center.
Each point in the universe will have a velocity field starting from the
interface of the electron.
Due to the spin of the interface at speed c, an inward
maximum acceleration field (AF) is c 2 / re, where
re is the radius of the interface enclosing the void, acts on the
interface. This inward-field at the interface is of the highest strength in the
universe, exerting a kind of pressure from space on to the electron's interface
and making it the most stable particle
(until it meets a positron and is annihilated).
It is shown (SVT) that a proton also has a
core of electrons/positrons accounting for its mass and an enclosing space
vortex creating a spinning interface that gives it the charge property (Fig. 3).
The spin of space at proton interface
calculated in SVT is at speed c/12 and consequently the maximum inward AF on the
interface is
(c/12) 2 / 12
re
where 12 re is the radius of the
interface of proton. This shows that the inward AF on proton's interface is 1728
time less that the AF on electron's interface.
All nuclei are enclosed within a space
vortex that spins them, produces charge effect and also creates inward AF that
acts against the outward electric repulsive forces due to protons within the
nuclei (Fig. 4).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MedicalConspiracies" group.
To post to this group, send email to:
MedicalConspiraciesgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to:
MedicalConspiracies-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at:
http://groups.google.com/group/MedicalConspiracies
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«
If Paranormal Research and Medical Conspiracies are of interest check out:
Paranormal_Research = Scientific Data & Health Conspiracies
To visit Paranormal_Research on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paranormal_Research/
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
Paranormal_Research-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion, If health related always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
