OK,
to follow up my recent post of things possibly worth
responding to
from /. comments.
__
SDC: Some of us have been doing this for YEARS. At least now
we have
a buzzword for it.
MFR: Indeed a lot of people have been doing this for years.
The
problem is, they have been doing it independently, and so in
different ways. As a consequence, different people have
their own way
of marking up the same kinds of content. Two recent surveys
[1] [2]
discovered that the noise to signal ratio in the use of
class and id
is so high that there is effectively no common semantics on
the web
based on the use of these values. So we have been doing this
for
years for little point.
One reason why microformats are valuable is the network
effect which
comes when a large amount of data is marked up in the same
way.
The commenter does emphasize an important aspect of
microformats -
they seek to standardize current practice and behavior,
rather than
invent new solutions to new problems. So it's a good thing
some of us
have been doing this for years. Now we can all do it the
same way and
really benefit from it.
[1] htt
p://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/2005/11/
real_world_sema.html
[2] http://cod
e.google.com/webstats/index.html
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|