|
List Info
Thread: Proposal: species
|
|
| Proposal: species |

|
2006-09-24 08:08:42 |
In message <06679606-BD0B-4CF2-9516-54D78D6A6930 lava.net>, Colin
Barrett <timber lava.net> writes
>
>On Sep 23, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> "Human being" is a reference to a
species, and should be marked up as
>> such on any page which includes it in a biological
context.
>
>That's quite a bit of extra metadata -- IIRC the species
tree has a
>height of about six or seven at its shortest. Is that
really necessary
>on EVERY page mentioning a scientific name in a
biological context?
No. Who has suggested that it is?
>Could an automated tool be written to, when the text
"Homo sapiens" is
>encountered, automatically mark it up into the correct
species
>microformat?
Yes - any find-and-replace tool can do that.
>is Genus Species a fairly unique way of identifying
something?
Of course. The whole point of taxonomy is to uniquely name
things.
>Or are there collisions?
No.
>I think questions like those will help your case --
sending dozens of
>links to this list will not.
Then you'd better ask TC why he asked for them.
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:
<http://www.no2id.net/>
a>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourd
ata.org.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
|
| Proposal: species |

|
2006-09-24 15:03:20 |
On Sep 23, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> In message <06679606-BD0B-4CF2-9516-54D78D6A6930 lava.net>, Colin
> Barrett <timber lava.net> writes
>
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>
>>> "Human being" is a reference to a
species, and should be marked up
>>> as
>>> such on any page which includes it in a
biological context.
>>
>> That's quite a bit of extra metadata -- IIRC the
species tree has a
>> height of about six or seven at its shortest. Is
that really
>> necessary
>> on EVERY page mentioning a scientific name in a
biological context?
>
> No. Who has suggested that it is?
Nobody -- I was unclear on the concept. The answer to the
question is
apparently: No.
>
>> Could an automated tool be written to, when the
text "Homo sapiens"
>> is
>> encountered, automatically mark it up into the
correct species
>> microformat?
>
> Yes - any find-and-replace tool can do that.
>
>> is Genus Species a fairly unique way of identifying
something?
>
> Of course. The whole point of taxonomy is to uniquely
name things.
OK, I didn't know that.
>
>> Or are there collisions?
>
>
>> I think questions like those will help your case --
sending dozens of
>> links to this list will not.
>
> Then you'd better ask TC why he asked for them.
I don't think he was asking for them to be posted to the
list, but to
be put on the examples page. I hope you're not coming away
with the
impression that people are attacking your idea or trying to
shoot it
down -- we're just trying to understand the "who, what,
where, why,
when, how" of this proposal -- not all of us are
experts in Taxonomy
-- evidenced earlier in this email .
I think the work you've been doing on this and the geo stuff
is
interesting -- unfortunately haven't had a chance to use
them in my
markup, but I am interested to see where things progress.
-Colin
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
|
| Proposal: species |

|
2006-09-24 17:08:47 |
In message <4E34BB54-0689-4448-BC6D-1A6F066A96DD lava.net>, Colin
Barrett <timber lava.net> writes
>>> I think questions like those will help your
case -- sending dozens of
>>> links to this list will not.
>>
>> Then you'd better ask TC why he asked for them.
>
>I don't think he was asking for them to be posted to the
list, but to
>be put on the examples page.
Immediately after citing, on this mailing, list an example
relating to
Geo, he said :
Andy, one thing that might help for the species
discussion is if
you could cite URLs to a site or sites with millions
(or even
thousands) of clearly obvious uses of
"species" terminology (not
just offhanded references like "human
being" or "plant") on
pages.
>I hope you're not coming away with the impression that
people are
>attacking your idea or trying to shoot it down -- we're
just trying to
>understand the "who, what, where, why, when,
how" of this proposal --
>not all of us are experts in Taxonomy -- evidenced
earlier in this
>email .
You and others maybe, but some certainly are "attacking
and shooting
down", or at least trying to - and being disingenuous,
if not dishonest,
in doing so.
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:
<http://www.no2id.net/>
a>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourd
ata.org.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
|
| Proposal: species |

|
2006-09-24 19:44:01 |
On 9/24/06 10:08 AM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> In message <4E34BB54-0689-4448-BC6D-1A6F066A96DD lava.net>, Colin
> Barrett <timber lava.net> writes
>
>>>> I think questions like those will help your
case -- sending dozens of
>>>> links to this list will not.
>>>
>>> Then you'd better ask TC why he asked for them.
>>
>> I don't think he was asking for them to be posted
to the list, but to
>> be put on the examples page.
>
> Immediately after citing, on this mailing, list an
example relating to
> Geo, he said :
In particular I noted a geo example already documented *on
the wiki*.
> Andy, one thing that might help for the species
discussion is if
> you could cite URLs to a site or sites with
millions (or even
> thousands) of clearly obvious uses of
"species" terminology (not
> just offhanded references like "human
being" or "plant") on
> pages.
Colin (and others') interpretation is correct, citing on the
*-examples page
(and then perhaps referencing it in email) is what I was
asking for, if
implicitly.
Thanks,
Tantek
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
|
[1-4]
|
|