List Info

Thread: Microformats are not for data storage




Microformats are not for data storage
user name
2006-10-30 14:36:27
On Oct 30, 2006, at 3:40 AM, B.K. DeLong wrote:

> and don't forget the plausibility of creating XSLTs to
convert the XML
> into whatever-the-heck-you-want for storage. ;)

A good point, although I'm not sure why you'd want to think
about that  
when creating a standard. XSLT to go from one format to
another sounds  
like a shoehorn for when you have widget X that wants format
A and  
widget Y that wants format B and they need to interact.
Planning to do  
this kind shoehorning from the start seems a bit silly. To
be a bit  
more topical: most of the widgets currently out there are
using XML,  
and there exist a lot of libraries and tools for working
with it. I  
still don't see how a uF for this sort of area (chat log
storage)  
isn't anything other than a pie-in-the-sky idea, and kind of
contrary  
to the uF process.

-Colin


> -- 
> B.K. DeLong (K3GRN)
> bkdelongpobox.com
> +1.617.797.8471
>
> http://www.wkdelong.org  
                 Son.
> http://www.ianetsec.com  
                 Work.
> http://www.bostonredcro
ss.org             Volunteer.
> http://www.caro
lingia.eastkingdom.org   Service.
> http://bkdelong.livej
ournal.com             Play.
>
>
> PGP Fingerprint:
> 38D4 D4D4 5819 8667 DFD5  A62D AF61 15FF 297D 67FE
>
> FOAF:
> http://foaf.brain-stream
.org
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discussmicroformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )