In message <8CFDDBE8-9145-41F9-91B8-FE12011F1F5F technorati.com>, Ryan
King <ryan technorati.com> writes
>> The 'wiki' page on rel-enclosure:
>>
>> <http:/
/microformats.org/wiki/rel-enclosure>
>>
>> say that its spec (sic) is a draft, as of
2005-06-21
>>
>> Is that still the case and, if so, has nothing
changed in over a year?
>
>Actually, no, not much has changed. rel-enclosure
doesn't have a lot
>of publishers or implementations.
There seems to be a chicken/ egg situation in that.
>Without the experience of that work, it's hard to have
confidence in
>it as a stable format.
What a pity. I'll have to advise my employers not to use it
on our site,
then.
>The same goes for the other formats you list.
Even the ones where the two pages disagree?
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:
<http://www.no2id.net/>
a>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourd
ata.org.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|