> Since XOXO itself only defines nested lists (and sets)
of items with
> arbitrary properties/values (with a certain fixed known
set for compat with
> existing uses), there is no expectation that
user/author defined properties
> themselves will interoperate.
Although if this were to be wanted in some use cases, an
'XOXO format'
could be defined. I have suggested some possibilities at
<http://blogxoxo.blogspot.com/2000/01/tags.htm
l?tags=xoxo+format> and
have considered the concept of extending uF with XOXO at
<http://blogxoxo.blogspot.com/2006/02/how-can-x
oxo-be-used.html>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|