On 2/21/07, Ryan Cannon <ryan ryancannon.com> wrote:
> Identifier is, Per the straw man[1]:
>
> > An (not necessarily globally unique) identifier,
such as a
> > cite-key, pubmed ID number, or simply the
reference number
> > or string within a publication ([1] or
[CLRS2001])
--- i'm not sure exactly when/where that explaination came
from, but i
would also include things like ISBN, ISSN as identifiers.
> I wrote an hCite export template for BibDesk*, and used
the
> identifier (cite-key)
> as the id attribute on the root element. I'll argue
that `identifier`
> is not data
> that needs to be accessible to humans, and we already
have a semantic
> equivalent
> in HTML.
--- i think identifiers such as ISBN are valuable as
human-readable data.
> Comments?
--- KEYS for things like BibTeX are not globally unique,
but unique
only to the bibtext file. This can be generated by any
transforming
application and are not needed in the mark-up. But KEYS are
not the
same as IDENTIFIERS. Identifiers should be human-readable
because
these are used to uniquely identify for find the object in a
physical
world. Things like key-value-pairs are machines use only and
shouldn't
be part of hCite.
-brian
--
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|