Re: adr should be

Sorry Ben! it was you. And you're right, the examples in the
docs are a 
bit misleading.

Ben Ward wrote:
>
> On 25 Feb 2007, at 23:19, Thom Shannon wrote:
>
>> Brian Suda made a point at barcamp about the
documentation using only 
>> divs and spans, so people don't get confused and
think that the 
>> element types matter. Obviously people should use
the most suitable 
>> elements in the context they're using them. But I
think this should 
>> be made much clearer in the wiki.
>
> Actually it was me who made that point, unless Brian
did as well, 
> separately from the panel. Anyway…
>
> Some time ago I suggested we put a disclaimer at the
top of each spec 
> making it clear that SPAN/DIV are used for example
purposes and then 
> have a new set of ‘rich examples’, complementing the
existing ones, 
> showing more diverse mark-up in use with microformats.
>
> Unfortunately I suck and haven't had the organisation
to do anything 
> with it, Though it remains on my to-do list.
>
> Ben
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discussmicroformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

An additional reason, is that the <address> element
cannot contain
block-level children, so  to have block-level children, you
would need a
block-level parent.

Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: microformats-discuss-bouncesmicroformats.org 
> [mailto:microformats-discuss-bouncesmicroformats.org] On 
> Behalf Of Thom Shannon
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 7:18 PM
> To: Microformats Discuss
> Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] adr should be
<address>
> 
> Sorry Ben! it was you. And you're right, the examples
in the 
> docs are a bit misleading.
> 
> Ben Ward wrote:
> >
> > On 25 Feb 2007, at 23:19, Thom Shannon wrote:
> >
> >> Brian Suda made a point at barcamp about the
documentation 
> using only 
> >> divs and spans, so people don't get confused
and think that the 
> >> element types matter. Obviously people should
use the most 
> suitable 
> >> elements in the context they're using them.
But I think 
> this should 
> >> be made much clearer in the wiki.
> >
> > Actually it was me who made that point, unless
Brian did as well, 
> > separately from the panel. Anyway.
> >
> > Some time ago I suggested we put a disclaimer at
the top of 
> each spec 
> > making it clear that SPAN/DIV are used for example
purposes 
> and then 
> > have a new set of 'rich examples', complementing
the existing ones, 
> > showing more diverse mark-up in use with
microformats.
> >
> > Unfortunately I suck and haven't had the
organisation to do 
> anything 
> > with it, Though it remains on my to-do list.
> >
> > Ben
> > _______________________________________________
> > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > microformats-discussmicroformats.org
> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discussmicroformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
> 

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss