On 2/27/07, Mike Kaply <microformats kaply.com> wrote:
> Incidentally, has anyone that worked on rel-tag ever
read this:
>
> http://www.
w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-opacity
--- i would agree that you can't infer information of just
ANY URL,
but because the publisher has EXPLICITLY added the rel-tag,
i would
say that you can.
The example of:
http://weather.exam
ple.com/oaxaca
certainly LOOKS like it is about oaxaca, but you can't
safely make
that assumption.
If a published adds additional information and excplicitly
says this
is a TAG about oaxaca, then they are asserting something
about the
link.
No matter how you slice it, you have to trust that the user
is
representing the metadata correctly, wether it is part of
the URL, the
title, the nodeValue or somewhere else. If you can't
trust the
publisher with the a tag and tagspace, why would you trust
them with
the data elsewhere?
-brian
--
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|