Jeremy,
> I'd be interested in hearing if anyone else feels as
strongly as I
> do that the title-design-pattern is something that
should codified
> as soon as possible. I'd be even more interested in
hearing if
> there's anybody, like Tantek, who feels that it's a bad
idea... or
> to be more accurate, who feels that the practical
benefits don't
> outweigh the semantic purity.
+1 for title-design-pattern
Although in all my testing on this issue, the
date-time-pattern still
announced the date correct (at least for hAtom, with dashes
and colons)
in terms of screenreader testing (JAWS 8 at advanced
verbosity, Window
Eyes 6 and Firevox).
I'm still somewhat confused as to why I've got different
results than
the ones reported on the WASP post by Jon Gibbons.
http://dotjay.co.uk/tests/screen-readers/da
te-time/#test-microformats
Any ideas? Or should I raise this with WaSP?
Lawrence
--
Lawrence Meckan
Absalom Media
Mob: (04) 1047 9633
ABN: 49 286 495 792
http://www.absalom.biz
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|