Toby Inkster wrote:
> Better than a[name] would be a[href], assuming a
relevent URI scheme exists:
>
> <a href="geo:51.36,-0.05">bond,
<abbr title="United
Kingom">UK</abbr></a>
>
> (See: http://geouri.org/)
>
> Disadvantages would be:
>
> 1. Involves using a poorly supported URI scheme. People
using browsers
> that don't support the scheme would get a link that
doesn't do anything,
> or brings up a cryptic message. (This could be worked
around with a
> combination of CSS and Javascript, but that seems a bit
hackish to me.)
>
> 2. This requires there to always *be* such a URI
scheme. There isn't a URI
> scheme for timestamps for instance. URI schemes cannot
be quickly and
> easily registered.
3. This puts those links in the tab cycle for keyboard
users, and on a
page listing lots of events it would turn into tabbing
hell.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
____________________________________________________________
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.c
om
____________________________________________________________
__
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task
Force
http://webstandards.org/
____________________________________________________________
__
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam
.webstandards.org/
____________________________________________________________
__
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|