Re: hRelease

If we they choose not to follow the microformat process,
what about 
suggesting them to call their specification a hFormat
instead of a 
microformat?

Guillaume
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

On 27 Jun 2007, at 23:40, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
> If we they choose not to follow the microformat
process, what about  
> suggesting them to call their specification a hFormat
instead of a  
> microformat?

‘format’ — sans ‘h’ — and ‘semantic HTML’ are serving well
enough I  
think, without throwing another piece of (dangerously close
to  
microformat spec terms) terminology to the mix.

Ben
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

On 6/27/07 3:40 PM, "Guillaume Lebleu" <glbrixlogic.com> wrote:

> If we they choose not to follow the microformat
process, what about
> suggesting them to call their specification a hFormat
instead of a
> microformat?

Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch
of us have
decided to push the POSH name/moniker.

You are welcome to use any set of semantic class names you
wish, because
that's just using POSH, and that's the right thing to call
it.

 http://microformats
.org/wiki/posh


Tantek

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

In message <C2A933BB.91282%tantekcs.stanford.edu>, Tantek
Çelik 
<tantekcs.stanford.edu> writes

>On 6/27/07 3:40 PM, "Guillaume Lebleu"
<glbrixlogic.com> wrote:
>
>> If we they choose not to follow the microformat
process, what about
>> suggesting them to call their specification a
hFormat instead of a
>> microformat?
>
>Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a
bunch of us have 
>decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
>
>You are welcome to use any set of semantic class names
you wish, 
>because that's just using POSH, and that's the right
thing to call it.

As far as the authors of hRelease are concerned, it's not
just "plain 
old semantic HTML", because they envisage hRelease
parsers, just as 
there are, say, hCard parsers.

That's the point at which the idea of POSH somehow
protecting the 
microformat "brand" fails.

-- 
Andy Mabbett

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss