Re: hRelease

Tantek Çelik wrote:
> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a
bunch of us have
> decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym,
but the only 
problem is that it is more a procedure than a substantive -
one cannot 
say "hRelease is a POSH" - and inevitably ends up
being tempted to say 
"hRelease is a microformat".

Guillaume


_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

Guillaume,

On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that
a bunch of us  
>> have
>> decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
> POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy
acronym, but the  
> only problem is that it is more a procedure than a
substantive - one  
> cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and
inevitably ends up being  
> tempted to say "hRelease is a microformat".

Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"?

-- ernie p.


_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss