Re: hRelease

I don't want to beat this one too long, but I still think
that the 
"what" is missing in "hRelease is POSH",
which makes the use awkward in 
contexts such as a launch of something like
"hRelease". Maybe the 
solution is simply to say "hRelease is a POSH
specification" or 
"hRelease is a POSH format".

Guillaume

Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
> Guillaume,
>
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
>> Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons
that a bunch of us have
>>> decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
>> POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy
acronym, but the 
>> only problem is that it is more a procedure than a
substantive - one 
>> cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and
inevitably ends up being 
>> tempted to say "hRelease is a
microformat".
>
> Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"?
>
> -- ernie p.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discussmicroformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss