In message <a06240803c2dc17dd1f45 [192.168.1.103]>, Eric
A. Meyer
<ericmeyerweb.com> writes
>>Could you to provide the evidence that was used to
conclude that Andy
>>failed to adhere to the "be nice"
guideline /after/ the
>>private warning?
>
> You mean besides posting a private message to a
public list?
The message from which I quoted was not "private",
It was sent to me "on
behalf of the microformats administration"
> By the administrators. Scott was simply the
administrator who gave
>public notice of the action.
> Interesting, that-- I always thought secret back-room
cabals tried
>to keep evidence of their abuses secret, and that people
responsible
>for shepherding a growing community and doing their best
to preserve it
>were up front about their actions. How I got those two
switched around
>I'll never know.
You're quite correct; so how come the transactions of the
group who
"shepherd" us (and who wants to be a sheep?) are
secret; the full
membership of that group is secret, and references to the
former's
existence have been removed from the "wiki":
<http://mic
roformats.org/wiki?title=mailing-lists&diff=14391&ol
did=14389#General_guidelines> ?
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
