Scott,
I think everyone would agree with your statement. However,
Andy's
concern with regards to the administration still hasn't been
addressed. This is the second time since I have subscribed
to this
list that there has been someone temporarily banned and both
times
there was the perception that the administration acted
unfairly.
I think the only think Andy is asking is for the
administration to
act with a bit of transparency & consistency.
Ciao,
Griffin
On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> My real concern is not with your intemperate
response, but with
>> the hypocrisy of an administration that allows you
free reign to
>> make one, but penalises another editor for
disagreeing with a
>> member of that administration, using far milder
terms.
>
> I think everyone here has free reign to make a mistake
now and
> then. We're only human. It's only repeated mistakes
that threaten
> to change our community standards. If the list were
full of name-
> calling, for example, people would start to think
name-calling were
> acceptable in this community. So in those cases, we
have to take
> some action if we want to maintain our community
standards. In my
> opinion, those tasked with this job do have an
increased
> responsibility to adhere to those standards (e.g.
"be nice"). But
> we're still only human, so we're still permitted the
occasional
> mistake, just like everyone else.
>
> Peace,
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discussmicroformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
