Manu Sporny wrote:
> Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>
>> I really like the idea of allowing additional
control over
>> presentation via pseudo-classes, but I am worried
that :target isn't
>> quite right, at least if we follow the spec to the
letter
>> (ht
tp://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#target-pseudo),
specifically
>> since this pseudo-class is not dynamic and there
may or may not be a
>> fragment identifier on the microformat.
>>
> The SemanticDataUI object would be accessible, from
Javascript, using
> the “semanticDataUI” global variable attached to the
currently loaded
> document. A publisher could disable the semantic data
UI in any browser
> by running the following line of Javascript:
>
> semanticDataUI.disableUI();
>
> Users could control whether or not they allow web pages
to disable the
> Semantic Data UI. Most would probably allow web pages
to disable the
> semantic data UI.
>
> Publishers could manually disable the Semantic Data UI
and use CSS to
> mark up their hCards, hCalendars, and hAudios.
>
> This would give cross-browser UI control to both the
users and the
> publishers without having to do any CSS magic.
Interesting! Perhaps semanticData.ui.disable() instead and
have
functions like semanticData.getDataById and other DOM-like
functions and
when you have some data you have fooDataObject.action() or
something and
fooDataObject.dataType just like nodeType exists in DOM
etc.
Something like a SDOM (SemanticDataObjectModel) standard?
/ Pelle
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|