Hi,
>> So I have a few questions about the wiki, which I
didn't found in the
>> wiki or the mailing archive. I would expand the
how-to-play article.
>>
>> * You don't use Mediawiki Categories. Why? I dont't
want to chance this
>> rule, I only want to explain it
>
> No particular reason. The best explanation may be that
no one's
> volunteered to do it yet.
>
But Tantek told my not to categorize? (Thats the reason why
I am "not
bold" and writing here)
>> * Is it OK to use more templates?
>> ** one for different language versions of an
Article, like the interwiki
>> concept
>> ** "buttons" or boxes for the status of
the site (standard, draft,
>> discuss)
>
> Once again, volunteers welcome. 
Great, I will do it;)
>
>> * can we use interwiki links to Wikipedia ( eg
[[wp:Baltimore]])
>
> I'm not sure how this syntax is better than a plain
link.
Plain links in a continuous text are often not so readable.
And link
sources you used very often (like Wikipedia) could so made
shorter.
>
>> * should we use more the project-namespace? Some
sides like how-to-play
>> could be there?
>
> In general I don't think namespaces buy us anything (on
the wiki, or
> elsewhere), so I don't think it's a good idea.
>
I think you are right, often content is too namespaced,
especially-filesystem-geeks overshoot here. So I will do It
without.
And if we want namespaces in the future, all options are
still open.
thanks
klml
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
