I suppose I should have posted this in the mailing list:
http://rbach.priv.at/Microformats/IRC/2007-12-06#T192503
-Sarven
On 1/7/08, Katrina <Kaz t-tec.com.au> wrote:
> Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
> > Andy Mabbett wrote:
> >>
> >> When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza
restaurants that labelled
> >> each telephone number as "work"?
> >>
> >> When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza
restaurants that included
> >> the managers' home numbers?
> >>
> >>
> > In that same vein, we could ask: when did you last
see a phone number
> > not being a work number when both a person's
formatted name and
> > organization name were present?
> >
> > So, to avoid the meta discussion and go back to
Kat's specific problem
> > (she wants to specify a phone as work but without
the content containing
> > "work" or any of its abbreviations),
maybe something that would work
> > would be to have an implied 'work' tel type when a
fn and an org that
> > are both present and a tel type is not present. I
believe we could have
> > an implied 'voice' type in this case as well.
> >
> > Sorry in advance if this idea has already been
proposed/discussed.
> >
>
> Awesome and Brilliant.
>
> Thanks Guillaume and Tantek! )
>
> Kat
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|