Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> to really evaluate this, there are two parameters to
take into account.
>
> nb of xhtml pages
> ----------------- [now]
> nb of total pages
>
I can probably tell you both of those numbers for the last
couple of
months. Knowing how many pages are malformed might take a
bit longer.
> but in my humble opinion, more interesting would be to
have this ratio
> for each year with *only the new pages* created during
the year.
> Unfortunately because there is no uniform way to sign
the date of
> pages, and because HTTP is even a worse shape than
HTML, it is almost
> impossible to evaluate.
Not so. The Internet Archive knows the first time they've
seen an URL,
over the past ten years; they can also tell you when the
content has
significantly changed. Obviously, there is a bias towards
pages (and
sites) with higher traffic, but that seems reasonable if
you're
evaluating standard practices. ~ Derrick Pallas
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|
