Andy Mabbett wrote:
> In message <1202227070.9752.13.camel weborganicscouk>, Martin McEvoy
> <info weborganics.co.uk> writes
>
>> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 01:56 +1100, Michael MD
wrote:
>>> >Why doesn't the following work for you,
then?
>>> >
>>> ><div class="haudio">
>>> > <span
class="contributor">Primal Scream</span>
-
>>> > <span
class="album">Screamadelica</span>
>>> ></div>
>>>
>>>
>>> That may be fine for someone who just wants to
mark up some tracks
>>> they like
>>> on a personal blog ... but an artist or record
store may want to be
>>> able to
>>> say who composed it, who performed it, who did
studio production, who
>>> remixed it, who a guest instumentalist was,
what label released it, and
>>> maybe even who distibutes it and want to be
able to distinguish between
>>> them.
>>
>> Oh but you can...
>>
>> <div class="haudio">
>> <span
class="album">Screamadelica</span>
>>
>> <span class="contributor vcard">
>> <span
class="role">Artist</span> -
>> <span class="fn org">Primal
Scream</span>
>> </span>
>
> 1) that's not the model referred to in "Why
doesn't the following work
> for you, then?", above.
>
> 2) Where is the evidence, in examples like that quoted
at the top if
> this post, that people publish terms like
"Artist" when referring to
> the key creator?
From looking at a selection of ten online music shops and
databases the
'key creator' is always implied by association. How about
removing the
'contributor' class from the key creator's vcard? It would
make sense to
me to group contributors separately to the creator. The
vcard attached
to the hAudio would denote the original creator.
For cover tracks you'd have something like:
<span class="contributor vcard">
<span class="role">Original
Artist</span> -
<span class="fn org">Primal
Scream</span>
</span>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microforma
ts-discuss
|