Jon, I agree with what you wrote about the difference
between live
conversations and the time-delayed conversations of email.
However, I
disagree with your apparent conclusion that quoting text is
the best or only
solution.
I believe that fully developed thoughts stand well on their
own, and not
only make it easier for folks who are relying on software to
read their
emails to them, but also encourage us all to think our ideas
throgh more
completely, and consider how our ideas might seem to the
people reading what
we write. As example, if I am forced to reiterate your
ideas back to you,
as I did at the beginning of this email, then that gives you
the best
possible chance to spot a misunderstanding on my part,
before the
conversation goes any further.
I cannot imagine folks a hundred years ago, cutting up each
other's letters
and gluing them into the outgoing mail with scissors and
mucilage. If they
were able write full paragraphs with topic sentences and
full context,
surely computers have not robbed us of that ability.
I will also quote no text, to show how these thoughts stand
on their own.
--
Lyman Lockwood
Webmaster, Programmer/Analyst-II
PP-CS Information Systems Group
3-8467
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
The following was automatically added to this message by the
list server:
For information about Micronet, including subscribing to
or unsubscribing from its mailing list and finding out
about upcoming meetings, please visit the Micronet Web site:
<http://micronet.be
rkeley.edu/>.
|