Sitegroup issue!

"Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zittinggmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,

Hi,
 
> > What happens when you want to update object's
sitegroup and you set sitegroup
> > property with some value and call update method?
Internal UPDATE_REPLIGARD
> > macro is used then,  after object's record was
successfully updated.
> > But the problem is that this macro is not
sitegroup aware!
> 
> Do we need this functionality? I mean moving objects
from sitegroup to
> another is not something you do regularly. Only
allowing sitegroup
> changes through the specific setsitegroup method sounds
safer to me.

Yes, but I asked about this many many months ago and answer
was to set 
sitegroup with typical property value change, so it  is done
like this.
But indeed some particular method should be implemented as
we must 
change all other object's ( like parameter or attachment )
sitegroup.

Piotras

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribemidgard-project.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpmidgard-project.org

Hi,

On 3/7/06, Piotras <ppinfoglob.com> wrote:
> Yes, but I asked about this many many months ago and
answer was to set
> sitegroup with typical property value change, so it  is
done like this.

 A
good example of the lack of architectural oversight I
mentioned
in the process thread.

> But indeed some particular method should be implemented
as we must
> change all other object's ( like parameter or
attachment ) sitegroup.

Agreed.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

--
Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - infoyukatan.fi
Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java
development