Will Monami6 meet in Dallas ?

Hi,

Sung-Hyuck Lee wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Vijay Devarapalli" <vijaydiprg.nokia.com>
>To: "Monami6 WG" <monami6ietf.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:10 AM
>Subject: Re: [Monami6] Will Monami6 meet in Dallas ?
>
>
>  
>
>>Thierry Ernst wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Dear all,
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, both Nicolas Montavont and I will
not be able to make it
>>>to the next IETF meeting in Dallas, for
different reasons. However, we
>>>have requested a 1-hour slot. 
>>>
>>>We have to decide (all together on this list)
whether the meeting should
>>>be maintained, or cancelled according to the
importance of topics to be
>>>discussed. If the meeting must be held, we will
appoint someone to chair
>>>it, and we will make our best to follow the
meeting via voice streaming
>>>and jabber.
>>>
>>>We don't feel a strong need to discuss WG
deliverables 1 and 2. About WG
>>>deliverable 3 (Multiple Care-of Address
Registration), this would depend
>>>on some issues discussed on the mailing list
once the draft is publised,
>>>otherwise, there might not be so much difference
with the discussion we
>>>had in Vancouver. What may be really new is
about the 4th WG deliverable
>>>(Policy Exchange), if the draft gets published
on time.
>>>
>>>
>>>Feel free to comment this "do we
meet" issue and to suggest anything you
>>>have in mind.
>>>      
>>>
>>perhaps, we could meet with the AD (or someone else)
chairing the meeting?
>>
>>Vijay
>>    
>>
>
>IMHO, we need to consider meetings with AD in Dallas. 
>  
>
I think finding people to chair the meeting is not a big
issue.
What is important, is to identify if the working group needs
to meet, 
and what are the topics of discussion.

We made clear that we (authors of deliverables 1 and 2)
don't feel the 
need to meet this time. Discussion on these documents can
happen on the 
mailing list.

About the 4th deliverable, we will publish a proposition
before the DL 
(hopefully). Basically, this document is what was presented
at the last 
IETF by Hesham. It might be interesting to present this
draft.

Please, if you have anything that you want to discuss during
a meeting, 
express yourself so we can arrange the meeting if necessary.

Nicolas

>
>Warm regards,
>
>Sung-Hyuck
>
>_______________________________________________
>Monami6 mailing list
>Monami6ietf.org
>https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
>  
>


_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Montavont <nicolas.montavontenst-bretagne.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Sung-Hyuck Lee wrote:
> 
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Vijay Devarapalli"
<vijaydiprg.nokia.com>
> >To: "Monami6 WG" <monami6ietf.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:10 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Monami6] Will Monami6 meet in Dallas
?
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Thierry Ernst wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Dear all,
> >>>
> >>>Unfortunately, both Nicolas Montavont and I
will not be able to make it
> >>>to the next IETF meeting in Dallas, for
different reasons. However, we
> >>>have requested a 1-hour slot. 
> >>>
> >>>We have to decide (all together on this
list) whether the meeting should
> >>>be maintained, or cancelled according to
the importance of topics to be
> >>>discussed. If the meeting must be held, we
will appoint someone to chair
> >>>it, and we will make our best to follow the
meeting via voice streaming
> >>>and jabber.
> >>>
> >>>We don't feel a strong need to discuss WG
deliverables 1 and 2. About WG
> >>>deliverable 3 (Multiple Care-of Address
Registration), this would depend
> >>>on some issues discussed on the mailing
list once the draft is publised,
> >>>otherwise, there might not be so much
difference with the discussion we
> >>>had in Vancouver. What may be really new is
about the 4th WG deliverable
> >>>(Policy Exchange), if the draft gets
published on time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Feel free to comment this "do we
meet" issue and to suggest anything you
> >>>have in mind.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>perhaps, we could meet with the AD (or someone
else) chairing the meeting?
> >>
> >>Vijay
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >IMHO, we need to consider meetings with AD in
Dallas. 
> >  
> >
> I think finding people to chair the meeting is not a
big issue.
> What is important, is to identify if the working group
needs to meet, 
> and what are the topics of discussion.
> 
> We made clear that we (authors of deliverables 1 and 2)
don't feel the 
> need to meet this time. Discussion on these documents
can happen on the 
> mailing list.
> 
> About the 4th deliverable, we will publish a
proposition before the DL 
> (hopefully). Basically, this document is what was
presented at the last 
> IETF by Hesham. It might be interesting to present this
draft.
> 
> Please, if you have anything that you want to discuss
during a meeting, 
> express yourself so we can arrange the meeting if
necessary.
I will publish new Internet-Draft during this week.
This document mainly describes some considerations regarding

the notification of multiple forwarding destinations
by the mobile node attaching to both home and foreign.
There has been already some discussion on this topic in ML, 
so the intention of this submission is to take a good look 
on this issue again for further discussion. 

The coauther and I are hoping that we can see initial
feedback 
from many WG members during a meeting if possible.

Regards,
Keigo


> 
> Nicolas
> 
> >
> >Warm regards,
> >
> >Sung-Hyuck
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Monami6 mailing list
> >Monami6ietf.org
> >https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monami6 mailing list
> Monami6ietf.org
> https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6



_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6

Hi Nicolas and Thierry

At Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:37:46 +0100,
Nicolas Montavont wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sung-Hyuck Lee wrote:
> 
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Vijay Devarapalli"
<vijaydiprg.nokia.com>
> >To: "Monami6 WG" <monami6ietf.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:10 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Monami6] Will Monami6 meet in Dallas
?
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Thierry Ernst wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Dear all,
> >>>
> >>>Unfortunately, both Nicolas Montavont and I
will not be able to make it
> >>>to the next IETF meeting in Dallas, for
different reasons. However, we
> >>>have requested a 1-hour slot. 
> >>>
> >>>We have to decide (all together on this
list) whether the meeting should
> >>>be maintained, or cancelled according to
the importance of topics to be
> >>>discussed. If the meeting must be held, we
will appoint someone to chair
> >>>it, and we will make our best to follow the
meeting via voice streaming
> >>>and jabber.
> >>>
> >>>We don't feel a strong need to discuss WG
deliverables 1 and 2. About WG
> >>>deliverable 3 (Multiple Care-of Address
Registration), this would depend
> >>>on some issues discussed on the mailing
list once the draft is publised,
> >>>otherwise, there might not be so much
difference with the discussion we
> >>>had in Vancouver. What may be really new is
about the 4th WG deliverable
> >>>(Policy Exchange), if the draft gets
published on time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Feel free to comment this "do we
meet" issue and to suggest anything you
> >>>have in mind.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>perhaps, we could meet with the AD (or someone
else) chairing the meeting?
> >>
> >>Vijay
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >IMHO, we need to consider meetings with AD in
Dallas. 
> >  
> >
> I think finding people to chair the meeting is not a
big issue.
> What is important, is to identify if the working group
needs to meet, 
> and what are the topics of discussion.
> 
> We made clear that we (authors of deliverables 1 and 2)
don't feel the 
> need to meet this time. Discussion on these documents
can happen on the 
> mailing list.
> 
> About the 4th deliverable, we will publish a
proposition before the DL 
> (hopefully). Basically, this document is what was
presented at the last 
> IETF by Hesham. It might be interesting to present this
draft.
> 
> Please, if you have anything that you want to discuss
during a meeting, 
> express yourself so we can arrange the meeting if
necessary.

The authors of the multiple CoA draft are updating the draft
according
to the comments received at the last meeting.  The draft'll
be surely
sent to IETF before the deadline.
After this updates, the plan was to ask whther this document
can be
adopted to WG document or not in Dallas.
However, such decision without both chairs are not
appropriate.

We can keep discussing this on ML.

regards,
ryuji




> Nicolas
> 
> >
> >Warm regards,
> >
> >Sung-Hyuck
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Monami6 mailing list
> >Monami6ietf.org
> >https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monami6 mailing list
> Monami6ietf.org
> https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
> 

_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6