OFFLINE: perfect response.
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry Ernst [mailto:ernst sfc.wide.ad.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: sarikayaieee.org; Monami6 WG
> Subject: Re: [Monami6] RE: Monami6 Digest, Vol 12,
Issue 4
>
>
>
> We perfeclty know what our job is and a meeting will be
held
> if there is
> a need for a meeting. So, now I would like people who
have never
> contributed to any technical discussion to stop
discussing if
> we should
> have a meeting or not and invite active people to
comment on the
> technical issues, which will give a hint if a meeting
is needed or not
> ...
>
> Thierry.
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:16:47 -0600
> Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikayayahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> > With this don't we have quite good concensus in
favor of
> a F2F meeting
> > in Dallas?
> > Shouldn't the co-chairs work on dressing up an
agenda and
> cooperate with
> > the AD to get an appropriate person to chair the
meeting?
> >
> > My 3 cents.
> >
> > --behcet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monami6 mailing list
> Monami6ietf.org
> https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
>
_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
|