> > => The interface between the LFN and the MR is
out of scope of both
> > nemo and monami6. But assuming that the MR is
somehow informed of
> > the LFN's choice,
>
> How? There isn't any way for LFNs to inform MR about
delegating
> authorization.
=> Huh? What authorisation does the LFN delegate for the
MR to send a BU
for the entire prefix, including its own address???
> > Of course the MR is authorised
>
> For MR to be authorized do flow bindings for the
entire prefix it
> would need a mechanism whereby all LFNs in that
network authorize the
> MR do these flow bindings.
=> Please answer my question above.
> > to send BUs for the entire prefix, which includes
all addresses, so
> > yes it can send a BU for a single address.
>
> I don't get that. NEMOv6 BUs are not per-LFN, they're
> either explicit
> (prefixes) or implicit (all hosts that HA's routing
table decides).
> LFN doesn't inform MR neither about BUs nor about its
flows.
=> But the MR sends the BU for the entire prefix anyway,
regardless of
what the LFN thinks. I'm surprised you're bringing this up,
how is the
MR authorised to send a BU for everyone or inject routes for
a prefix
that includes all MNNs not just the LFN??
Hesham
_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6 ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
|