Dear all,
The motivations and scenarios WG draft has been updated. We
would be
happy to get comments on this document prior to the Monami6
meeting
next Wednesday in Chicago, the goal being the issue of a
WGLC right
after the IETF meeting.
Please find below a list of the updates and remaining points
open for
discussion (changes in version -02 should be taken as
suggestions, we
can roll back in case of disagreement - for people who don't
know, you
can easily see the changes using the RFC diff tool: please
see the
results in the attached file for your convenience):
=== Changes between version -02 and -01 ===
- various editorial changes throughout the document.
- most scenarios have been updated in order to look more
"realistic".
- the scenario with the most important changes is 3.4 which
now refers
to the ongoing work within the ITS industry (Intelligent
Transportation
Systems), e.g. ISO's CALM architecture.
- issue 6.4 title changed from "Address Change" to
"Transparency"
- conclusion rewritten
=== Open discussion points ===
- I would like to know in which extend
draft-ietf-monami6-mipv6-analysis,
draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues
and draft-ietf-monami6-multhoming-motivation-scenario should
be
uniformized, particularly
- Section 3: I think we should also consider the Aeronautic
scenario,
and the Personal Mobile Router scenario has presently
discussed in the
NEMO WG with respect to NEMO RO. This would somewhat fulfill
a gap and
would be useful for people outside the IETF.
- Section 6: Is the issue list complete ?
Thierry.
Motivations and Scenarios for Using Multiple Interfaces and
Global
Addresses
http://www.ietf.org
/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-monami6-multihoming-motivation-s
cenario-02.txt
In this document, multihoming is investigated from an
end-node point of
view, and not from a site point of view as the term
"multihoming" is
commonly understood so far. The purpose of this document is
to explain
the motivations for fixed and mobile nodes (hosts and
routers) using
multiple interfaces and the scenarios where this may end up
using
multiple global addresses on their interfaces. Such
multihoming
configurations can bring a number of benefits once
appropriate support
mechanisms are put in place. Interestingly, this analysis
is generic,
i.e. motivations and benefits of node multihoming apply to
both fixed
end nodes and mobile end nodes.
--
Thierry ERNST, PhD
INRIA Rocquencourt France Project-Team IMARA / JRU LARA
http://www.lara.prd.fr
+33 1 39 63 59 30 (office)
--
The coming end of the IPv4 world: http://penrose.uk6x.com
_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6 ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
|
