Object parsing

Hi,

Reviewing the test for OBJECT_OR_SCRIPTS in mobileOK basic
[1] doesn't
take into account the nested fallback mechanism allowed by
the object
element.

It should:
* explain that the objects can be nested and that the tester
needs to
look into each of the nested object until it find a proper
fallback
* a proper fallback could be an <object> itself and
not only an <img> or
some text
* the object element can contain a number of child elements
(<param>
among others); how does this affect the test :
"If element body is non-empty and does not consist of
text or an img
element that refers to an image in a supported format"
(in particular, it's not exactly clear what "element
body" means here)

Again, sorry this comes after the last call period closed;
the editors
encouraged me to make that comment despite this.

Dom

1.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD
-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/#test_objects_or_script

 Dear Dominique Hazael-Massieux ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the
comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the W3C
mobileOK Basic
Tests 1.0 published on 30 Jan 2007. Thank you for having
taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included
below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document
available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests
-20070525/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with
it or not
before 22 June 2007. In case of disagreement, you are
requested to provide
a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the
Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the
opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the
Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in
the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Michael(tm) Smith
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http:/
/www.w3.org/mid/1175603203.4535.80.camelcumulustier
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests
-20070130/


=====

Your comment on 3.15 OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPT (partial):
> Reviewing the test for OBJECT_OR_SCRIPTS in mobileOK
basic [1] doesn't
> take into account the nested fallback mechanism allowed
by the object
> element.
> 
> It should:
> * explain that the objects can be nested and that the
tester needs to
> look into each of the nested object until it find a
proper fallback
> * a proper fallback could be an <object> itself
and not only an <img>
> or
> some text
> * the object element can contain a number of child
elements (<param>
> among others); how does this affect the test :
> "If element body is non-empty and does not consist
of text or an img
> element that refers to an image in a supported
format"
> (in particular, it's not exactly clear what
"element body" means here)


Working Group Resolution:
Yes and appropriate changes will be made to the document to
reflect.

----