Am 12.06.2007 um 22:29 schrieb Julian H. Stacey:
> FreeBSD has progressively broken support for 5 of my
older laptops.
> One needs massive time reading manuals etc, only then
to fail anyway,
> getting beyond 4.11. (Only 1 modern here takes 6.2).
I can confirm this for my parents' (formerly owned by my
brother)
Mitac Mi-Note 6020.
It works with 4.10, but wouldn't boot 5 or 6 or even the
7-snapshot I
once tried.
I may try with the June snapshots (but how do you backup a
computer
whose only network connection is an 11MBit wireless card?).
This is a Celeron 366 with 320 or so MB RAM.
It just panics during probing.
The reason I didn't report this is that
a) it currently works (running StarOffice 7 on KDE)
b) it's physically so broken (all hinges are so hard to
open/close
that they are broken out of the case on all sides - the
thing is
sitting in a wooden frame that my father built
c) I also run FreeBSD on servers. I'd rather like developers
to spend
their limited time on getting it to work better on the
latest server-
hardware and on newer laptops (which are arriving every
quarter)
>
> 4.11 is nominally dead, yet on many older laptops is
all that Works.
Personally, I suspect really bad ACPI-implementations as the
reason
for the kernel-panics I get (no success with safe-mode, ACPI
or no
ACPI).
And 4.x _is_ dead. Not only nominally, but really. No fixes.
Ports
don't build. End of game. RIP.
(I've got a server with 4.11 in a colo 500 km away that is
waiting
for a 'decision')
> Newcomers may give up after 6.2 & dump FreeBSD, not
knowing to use
> 4.11
> with working { ATA access, Geom / FDISK, PCMCIA (ether
& cdrom),
> PLIP }.
>
Newcomers today will either have one of those 600 Euro
el-cheapo
laptops from one of the big electronic-supermarket-chains,
or will
have had the sense to buy at least a Pentium3-Mobile-class
system on
ebay (can be had very cheaply, usually works like built for
FreeBSD).
The other old laptop I own (a Dell Inspiron 4000, Celeron
800 with
512 MB RAM) runs 6.x almost as fast as my Pentium-M 1.6 with
1GB RAM.
So to conclude: I'm all for supporting slow hardware (WRAP,
Soekris -
you name it) - but when we talk about hardware that was
"new" seven
or more years ago (and with most problems probably caused by
BIOS-
bugs), I can also support drawing a final stroke.
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Duffner
CISSP, LPI, MCSE
rainer ultra-secure.de
_______________________________________________
freebsd-mobile freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|