I wouldn't call it dictatorship. At some point there has to
be made the
decision to stop change the logo. It is not good to change
your logo
continously, because a logo is a brand. People recognize a
logo and it
is important to position yourself in the market. So I can
understand
this decision. Eventhough this is an open source
application, it still
needs a recognizable brand and to become popular. And after
all that is
what we all want... Popular open source applications for
everyone, used
by everyone. Maybe Lluis should have told it differently,
but that is
merely a choice of words. It is all marketing. Something
most of us
don't deal with, but is still a part of the acceptance of an
application.
Regards,
Arjan.
Citeren Gideon de Swardt <gdeswardt1978 yahoo.co.uk>:
>> I think there is no point in opening the logo
discussion again. People
>> in the list already gave their opinion on the
colors to use. The
>> original colors where the most preferred colors.
>>
>> Lluis
>
> Isn't that a bit dictatorship like?
>
> There are some that in a later post indicated that they
thought it was a
> good idea to open it up again and then have a vote on
it and open up the
> vote to people outside of the monodevelop development
community, to get
> their feedback.
>
> Thought we are supposed to be a community, where people
can voice their
> interest ideas etc. Thought open source meant open in
every sense of the way
> and not dictatorship. Maybe it was a very novel and
innocent of me to think
> that.
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
> All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of Vi gr ! come-ons? Let our
SpamGuard
> protect you. http://uk.doc
s.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
>
_______________________________________________
Monodevelop-list mailing list
Monodevelop-list lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-li
st
|