List Info

Thread: TextEditor




TextEditor
user name
2006-11-26 15:14:36
* Matej Urbas <matej.urbasgmail.com> [2006-11-04
15:22]:
> Hi
> 
> Actually not! SharpDevelop uses non-segmented text
buffers (with layered line managers).
> But judging from the previous series of posts, I guess
that most people were in favour of line-segmented text
buffers.
> So, it won't be a total port... (by me at least, since
I'm strictly against non-segmented text buffers  )


Before taking this decision I *strongly* suggest looking
into "Dissection C#
Application", it's the book mentioned earlier about #D.
They were using the segmented aproach at start, but then
moved to
non-segmented. They describe it there and advocate why it is
better.
In your place I wouldn't want to repeat their mistakes, but
learn from
them.

Greets.

-- 
Grzegorz "Silk" Sobański                       
silk (at) boktor.net
I am root. If you see me laughing,                 http://boktor.net
you better have backups.
_______________________________________________
Monodevelop-list mailing list
Monodevelop-listlists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-li
st
TextEditor
user name
2006-11-26 16:10:44
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 16:14 +0100, Grzegorz Sobanski wrote:
> * Matej Urbas <matej.urbasgmail.com> [2006-11-04
15:22]:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Actually not! SharpDevelop uses non-segmented text
buffers (with layered line managers).
> > But judging from the previous series of posts, I
guess that most people were in favour of line-segmented text
buffers.
> > So, it won't be a total port... (by me at least,
since I'm strictly against non-segmented text buffers  )
> 
> 
> Before taking this decision I *strongly* suggest
looking into "Dissection C#
> Application", it's the book mentioned earlier
about #D.
> They were using the segmented aproach at start, but
then moved to
> non-segmented. They describe it there and advocate why
it is better.
> In your place I wouldn't want to repeat their mistakes,
but learn from
> them.

Interesting. I will try to find one copy. Thanks.

I would like to see the reasons behind this, heck, it's one
of the
reasons I'll start this as a research and coding exercise
for some of my
classes in the next semester (or even during the SoC ;D ).
Currently,
there's too much going on around here. And I have to get my
school and
other assignments done in time... (Staying up until 5:00 AM
regularly is
really doing me in...)


If anyone is going to start before I get to it, I'll do as
well as I can
to somehow contribute 


Enjoy,
---
Matej

_______________________________________________
Monodevelop-list mailing list
Monodevelop-listlists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-li
st
TextEditor
user name
2006-11-26 17:47:27
Hi Matej,

> > Before taking this decision I *strongly* suggest
looking into 
> > "Dissection C# Application", it's the
book mentioned 
> earlier about #D.
> > They were using the segmented aproach at start,
but then moved to 
> > non-segmented. They describe it there and advocate
why it is better.
> > In your place I wouldn't want to repeat their
mistakes, but 
> learn from 
> > them.
> 
> Interesting. I will try to find one copy. Thanks.

It's available digitally for free. See the link at
http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/InsideS
harpDevelop.aspx

Charlie


_______________________________________________
Monodevelop-list mailing list
Monodevelop-listlists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-li
st
[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )