Re: NASM 64-bit: are we there yet (once more, with feeling...)

Charles Crayne wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:58:30 -0700
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpazytor.com> wrote:
> 
>> I don't think it can, but we can call it 1.99.0.
> 
> Since I wanted to familiarize myself with the release
process, I tried
> making a 2.0RC1 release, which seems to work just
fine.
> 

Sure, but what did the version script and the associated
stuff do with
it afterwards?

	-hpa

------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nasm-devel mailing list
Nasm-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nasm-devel