Re: nasm-devel problem...

Debbie Wiles wrote:
> Message body follows:
> 
> Hi Frank

Hi Debs!!!

> Long time no speak 

Yeah... We've missed your input on the "list"!

> I'm back online a lot more regularly
> now and getting back into some coding, and naturally
my
> first port of call was here.

And here...

http://www
.ukcpu.net/Programming/index.asp

Kewl!

> Seeing Peter's post about the 2.02RC2 upload, I have
> downloaded the DOS 32-bit and the Windows versions. I
tried
> to post to the nasm-devel list, but my message bounced,
so I
> am consulting you about it...
> 
> First question is: Do I need to do or change anything
before
> my posts can be accepted by the nasm-devel list after
the
> long break I've had?

"Shouldn't" need to... but we know what *that's*
worth! The only thing I 
can suggest is re-subscribe. I, and others, have been
mysteriously 
un-subscribed from time to time. "Retry" seems to
often work, at SF, and 
is often necessary (you ought to hear me curse the
"release" process!)...

> I thought I remembered being able to
> just reply.

At one time, "reply" replied only to the original
poster. Had to hit 
"reply all" to get the list too. That seems to
have changed... Doubt if 
it's your problem.

> When I read the list online, it is marked as
> read-only, despite my being logged in.

The online interface seems especially useless. I can't
figure any way to 
delete spam (hmmm... maybe I can...). Nelson Rush (Palisade)
is "owner", 
AFAIK... Maybe *he'll* pop up and say "long time no
speak" someday, too. 
(I'll try a cc to him... maybe he's been unsubscribed, too -
Hi Nelson!)

> Secondly, and in case I am unable to send posts to the
right
> list. The DOS-32 binaries are not in the zip file I
> downloaded for it. It contains:
> 
> cwsdpmi.exe
> COPYING
> README
> nasmdoc.txt
> cwsdpmi.doc
> 
> Earlier versions have had more files (I didn't check
them
> all though), and it certainly should contain the nasm
binary
> if it is to be listed as a DOS 32-bit binary 
> 
> Hope this message has been helpful 

Oh, oh! Peter's build-bot seems to have dropped a bit or
two. Sorry I 
didn't notice that (obvious from the size, if you look).
Other packages 
seem okay(?). We'll get that fixed... or... I guess this
release isn't 
expected to last long anyway...

Thanks for the heads-up, Debs. Looking forward to
"talking" with you!

Best,
Frank


------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nasm-devel mailing list
Nasm-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nasm-devel

Frank Kotler wrote:
> 
>> Seeing Peter's post about the 2.02RC2 upload, I
have
>> downloaded the DOS 32-bit and the Windows versions.
I tried
>> to post to the nasm-devel list, but my message
bounced, so I
>> am consulting you about it...
>>
>> First question is: Do I need to do or change
anything before
>> my posts can be accepted by the nasm-devel list
after the
>> long break I've had?
> 
> "Shouldn't" need to... but we know what
*that's* worth! The only thing I 
> can suggest is re-subscribe. I, and others, have been
mysteriously 
> un-subscribed from time to time. "Retry"
seems to often work, at SF, and 
> is often necessary (you ought to hear me curse the
"release" process!)...
> 

Hi Debs... could you send me the bounce message you got?  It
would help.

>> I thought I remembered being able to
>> just reply.
> 
> At one time, "reply" replied only to the
original poster. Had to hit 
> "reply all" to get the list too. That seems
to have changed... Doubt if 
> it's your problem.
> 
>> When I read the list online, it is marked as
>> read-only, despite my being logged in.
> 
> The online interface seems especially useless. I can't
figure any way to 
> delete spam (hmmm... maybe I can...). Nelson Rush
(Palisade) is "owner", 
> AFAIK... Maybe *he'll* pop up and say "long time
no speak" someday, too. 
> (I'll try a cc to him... maybe he's been unsubscribed,
too - Hi Nelson!)

I have administrative access, so I can take care of things.

>> Secondly, and in case I am unable to send posts to
the right
>> list. The DOS-32 binaries are not in the zip file
I
>> downloaded for it. It contains:
>>
>> cwsdpmi.exe
>> COPYING
>> README
>> nasmdoc.txt
>> cwsdpmi.doc
>>
>> Earlier versions have had more files (I didn't
check them
>> all though), and it certainly should contain the
nasm binary
>> if it is to be listed as a DOS 32-bit binary 
>>
>> Hope this message has been helpful 
> 
> Oh, oh! Peter's build-bot seems to have dropped a bit
or two. Sorry I 
> didn't notice that (obvious from the size, if you
look). Other packages 
> seem okay(?). We'll get that fixed... or... I guess
this release isn't 
> expected to last long anyway...

D'oh 

> Thanks for the heads-up, Debs. Looking forward to
"talking" with you!

Indeed... we're *missed you!!*

------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nasm-devel mailing list
Nasm-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nasm-devel