Total rubbish, if your on a T1 and my site is slow, your ISP has major
issues. The only flash content is actually on the gallery part ! In
fact the flash animation is only about 148k insize and the images are
between 20-40k each.
Anyway, im not getting into a slanging match over flash, there are far
worse sites that are 100% flash !
http://www.stevemccurry.com/main.php
--- In NIKOND200%40yahoogroups.com">NIKOND200
yahoogroups.com, "Bob Nix" <nix...> wrote:
>
> I've only casually followed this thread, but if we're still talking
> about the same site, then I'm on a T1 line, and the site was painfully
> slow, to the point that I looked at two pictures, and finally gave up.
>
> Flash is a wonderful technology, and I do use it, but you can go
> overboard with anything, and there's no sense for building glitz for
> glitz' sake. I prefer a usable site.
> --
> Bob Nix
>
> --- In NIKOND200%40yahoogroups.com">NIKOND200yahoogroups.com, "Bob Lewis"; <bob> wrote:
> >
>; > I understand the frustration of those who have dial-up connections
> > regarding the long, sometimes impossible, load times for "Flash"
> > sites. But what I don't understand is the rudeness and mean spirited
> > comments lobbed at those who decide to take advantage of that
> > technology to build their web sites. The fact is that there are many
> > many sites on tne web that are flash powered and not all of them have
> > a non-flash option for slower connections. As technology advances
> > those with dial-up connections are going to be left behind
> > unfortunately.
>
.
