On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:48:20PM +0300, Ivan Kalvachev
wrote:
> >alternative suggestions, and comments welcome,
personally iam fine with
> >all the options left (for I and IAA a volunteer
would be needed to maintain
> >a few tables)
>
> Excellent analysis. I guess there is no need to say I
am in favour of
> IAA system.
>
> We need compatibility (so 'I' is out)
>
> I demand creating our own system. The purpose - once
the other formats
> are obsolete this system will be the only valid. (this
eliminates
> i-avi and AAA).
>
> I had proposed 'I' type system in my "Fourcc vs
format_id" mail.
> In short:
> "format_id" - string with the format
specific stream. Must not overlap
> with any of the existing systems. No acronyms.
> "profile" - used capabilities of the
profile. (hw players quick
> rejection, stream servers support).
> "encoder" string describing the
encoder&version(used for bugs
> workaround and fame/blame of quality).
And I strongly dislike this. Most of the information is not
known by
the program generating the file and should not need to be
known.
Different profiles can already have their own different
format ids.
Separating to multiple fields just creates complexity for
complexity's
sake which is bad.
Rich
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|