Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> What you're saying is that because any system CAN be
abused, rather
> try to start out with something sane, you incorporate
an existing,
> already very abused, "system" lock, stock and
barrel. Makes no sense
> to me.
>
Last time we discussed it we ended with a "who
implements the codeclist
got it in the spec", nobody stepped up with a list
nicer than what we
have now.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/
~lu_zero
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|