Luca Barbato <lu_zero gentoo.org> writes:
> Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>>
>> What you're saying is that because any system CAN
be abused, rather
>> try to start out with something sane, you
incorporate an existing,
>> already very abused, "system" lock, stock
and barrel. Makes no sense
>> to me.
>
> Last time we discussed it we ended with a "who
implements the codeclist
> got it in the spec", nobody stepped up with a list
nicer than what we
> have now.
I don't see ANY list. I don't care if you copy someone
else's list,
or invent your own, but whatever you do, it HAS to be in the
spec.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru inprovide.com
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|