On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:45:11PM +0100, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Oded Shimon <ods15 ods15.dyndns.org>
writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:47:05AM +0100, Måns
Rullgård wrote:
> >> Luca Barbato <lu_zerogentoo.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> What you're saying is that because
any system CAN be abused, rather
> >> >> try to start out with something sane,
you incorporate an existing,
> >> >> already very abused,
"system" lock, stock and barrel. Makes no sense
> >> >> to me.
> >> >
> >> > Last time we discussed it we ended with a
"who implements the codeclist
> >> > got it in the spec", nobody stepped
up with a list nicer than what we
> >> > have now.
> >>
> >> I don't see ANY list. I don't care if you
copy someone else's list,
> >> or invent your own, but whatever you do, it
HAS to be in the spec.
> >
> > one of the many proposed lists:
> > http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/nut-devel
/2006-June/000433.html
>
> Yes, there were a few PROPOSED lists. None of them
were adopted in
> the actual spec.
>
> > This is mostly grave-digging. I've never cared
strongly about the issue.
>
> Therein lies the problem. You can't set out designing
a file format
> ignoring one of the fundamental aspects. Until this
changes, I
> consider the NUT format incomplete and a waste of time.
Would it make you happy if something like this was added to
the spec?
possible fourcc's:
"XVID","DIVX","DX50","FMP
4" MPEG-4 Part 2
"H264","h264" MPEG-4 Part 10
"vrbs" Xiph.org Vorbis
"x00x50" MP1, MP2
"x00x55" MP3
....
* note: the list is not a complete list and values can be
added in the
future
Since I don't care about the issue, I don't mind if you add
such a thing
to the spec... For you this is fundemental. For me, this is
bikeshed.
- ods15
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-develmplayerhq.hu
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|