|
List Info
Thread:
|
|
|
  Austria |
2008-02-12 07:07:20 |
Hi
see attached
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing
something just because
microsoft did it is even more stupid. If everything ms did
were stupid they
would be bankrupt already.
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
| Re: |
  Germany |
2008-02-12 08:03:39 |
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> The ID values used are the same as in AVI, so if a
codec uses a specific
> FourCC in AVI then the same FourCC MUST be used
here.
> + For raw video and audio, the used sample format
(signed/unsigned,
> + 8/16/32bit, big/little endian, rgb/yuv) is
indicated by the fourcc.
24-bit audio (i.e., not padded to 32 bits) might make
sense.
AVI has separate FourCCs for raw video formats but not for
raw audio
formats. I guess the intention is to use the MOV codes in
these cases?
Regards,
Clemens
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
| Re: |

|
2008-02-12 08:17:22 |
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> The ID values used are the same as in AVI, so
if a codec uses a specific
>> FourCC in AVI then the same FourCC MUST be
used here.
>> + For raw video and audio, the used sample
format (signed/unsigned,
>> + 8/16/32bit, big/little endian, rgb/yuv) is
indicated by the fourcc.
>
> 24-bit audio (i.e., not padded to 32 bits) might make
sense.
>
> AVI has separate FourCCs for raw video formats but not
for raw audio
> formats. I guess the intention is to use the MOV codes
in these cases?
I stand by my opinions on fourccs, previously discussed at
length.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans mansr.com
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel |
|
| Re: |
  Austria |
2008-02-12 08:34:23 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:03:39PM +0100, Clemens Ladisch
wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > The ID values used are the same as in AVI, so
if a codec uses a specific
> > FourCC in AVI then the same FourCC MUST be
used here.
> > + For raw video and audio, the used sample
format (signed/unsigned,
> > + 8/16/32bit, big/little endian, rgb/yuv) is
indicated by the fourcc.
>
> 24-bit audio (i.e., not padded to 32 bits) might make
sense.
There is nothing in this patch that precludes 24 or even
123bit audio.
it does just list by examples what the fourcc specifies.
>
> AVI has separate FourCCs for raw video formats but not
for raw audio
> formats. I guess the intention is to use the MOV codes
in these cases?
You take a few steps too far. First we need to decide what
the fourcc for raw
audio does specify. Then we can decide if the ones from mov
are an
appropriate choice.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished
by being
governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
| Re: |
  Austria |
2008-02-12 08:37:21 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:34:23PM +0100, Michael
Niedermayer wrote:
[...]
> >
> > AVI has separate FourCCs for raw video formats but
not for raw audio
> > formats. I guess the intention is to use the MOV
codes in these cases?
>
> You take a few steps too far. First we need to decide
what the fourcc for raw
> audio does specify. Then we can decide if the ones from
mov are an
> appropriate choice.
And as mov uses "sowt" for both 8bit and 16bit the
awnser to your question
is likely "no, we cant use the mov fourccs here"
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you
should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is
less readable
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
| Re: |
  Austria |
2008-02-16 20:53:01 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +0100, Michael
Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> see attached
What about this?
Any comments, alternative suggestions? objections?
mans, is your comment about fourccs a objection? If so what
do you suggest
to identify the needed things for raw video/audio.
If there are no objections then ill commit in 48h.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the
bug with no
further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is
wrong.
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
| Re: |

|
2008-02-16 22:05:11 |
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni gmx.at> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +0100, Michael
Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> see attached
>
> What about this?
>
> Any comments, alternative suggestions? objections?
> mans, is your comment about fourccs a objection? If so
what do you suggest
> to identify the needed things for raw video/audio.
The diff is fine, provided those fourccs are actually
specified
somewhere.
It's the deferring of codec tag definitions to some
ill-defined AVI
common practice I dislike. But we've had that discussion
already...
--
Måns Rullgård
mans mansr.com
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
| Re: |
  Austria |
2008-02-17 07:59:00 |
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:05:11AM +0000, Måns Rullgård
wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni gmx.at> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +0100, Michael
Niedermayer wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> see attached
> >
> > What about this?
> >
> > Any comments, alternative suggestions?
objections?
> > mans, is your comment about fourccs a objection?
If so what do you suggest
> > to identify the needed things for raw
video/audio.
>
> The diff is fine, provided those fourccs are actually
specified
> somewhere.
nut4cc.txt should do that.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our
enemies excel us
and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and
imitating what
is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|
|
[1-8]
|
|