On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:17:10PM +0100, michael wrote:
> Author: michael
> Date: Wed Feb 13 15:17:09 2008
> New Revision: 624
>
> Log:
> header elision update
>
>
> Modified:
> docs/nutissues.txt
>
> Modified: docs/nutissues.txt
>
============================================================
==================
> --- docs/nutissues.txt (original)
> +++ docs/nutissues.txt Wed Feb 13 15:17:09 2008
>  -115,6 +115,8  we already know like the frame size.
> A. Store header bytes and length in the framecode
table.
> B. Leave things as they are.
>
> +Implemented
> +
>
> Issue small-frames
> ------------------
>  -135,6 +137,8  D. Use header compression, that is allow
> would allow us to store the size of a frame without
any redundancy.
> Thus effectivly avoiding the overhead small frames
cause.
>
> +It seems the consensus is: A+D
With the specified bounds...
Rich
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-devel mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel
|