pool/spl cleanup in netinet, netinet6, net

Thor Lancelot Simon <tlsrek.tjls.com> writes:

> Now I am looking at the pf code.  It looks as if there
is an assumption
> in that code that only its timeout routines are ever
entered not at
> splsoftnet -- but I am not sure that's true.  I really
wish we had some
> better documentation of which parts of our network
stack can and can't
> take which interrupts.

Or assertions, or even function annotations the compiler
could
propagate..... while the latter might be a wild dream,
having spl
assertions (which are hacked into a couple of places
already) should
be a SMOP, right?

        - Nathan

Thor Lancelot Simon <tlsrek.tjls.com> writes:

> Now I am looking at the pf code.  It looks as if there
is an assumption
> in that code that only its timeout routines are ever
entered not at
> splsoftnet -- but I am not sure that's true.  I really
wish we had some
> better documentation of which parts of our network
stack can and can't
> take which interrupts.

Or assertions, or even function annotations the compiler
could
propagate..... while the latter might be a wild dream,
having spl
assertions (which are hacked into a couple of places
already) should
be a SMOP, right?

        - Nathan