Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.

In article <20080109181955.GA8101952qnx.com>,
Sean Boudreau  <seanbqnx.com> wrote:
> 
>> Is there a reason not to call it
"proxy"?
>> 
>> christos
>
>Other than historical none that I can see.  We
>can document "proxy" but continue to match on
>"pro" in the code?

That is an excellent idea.

christos