List Info

Thread: Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...




Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
country flaguser name
United States
2007-10-19 15:14:24
Pavel Cahyna <pavelnetbsd.org> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Greg Oster
wrote:
>> Greg Troxel writes:
>> > Because of this I've always just bought two
big disks and done RAID-1.
>> 
>> RAID 1 has the same issue -- Say the machine dies
at the point where
>> block n is written to component 0 but not to
component 1.  If 
>> component 0 dies before block n gets synced between
the two, then 
>> when you read block n from component 1, you're
going to get the old 
>> data.

But that's ok - the property that if you crash near a write
you get
either the old data or the new data means that the RAID set
behaves like
a non-failing disk, and that's ok. 

My concern about RAID-5, which seems to be addressed by
judicious stripe
size choices, is that I thought it was possible to have the
system go
down, without any failures, and after reboot/reconstruction
have bits
that were not either the old or the new.

It would be really nice to explain this and what stripe
sizes to use in
the RAIDframe section of the guide.  I definitely don't
understand this
well enough to give advice - just enough to be worried.

> I am curious - what do the BIOS-based software RAID
controllers (as
> offered by e.g. Promise and supported by ataraid(4)) do
to correct the
> situation when block n is written to component 0 but
not 1? AIUI, you have
> to do a re-sync after such unclean shutdown (hoping
that the component
> won't die before the data are synced) or have a battery
backed cache.
> So, do those "RAID controllers" re-sync
parity after unclean shutdown?

That's a good question - I have assumed they do a parity
rewrite much
like RAIDframe does.  I have the impression none of the
included raid
features have battery backed caches (that's for expensive
cards, which
may well be worth it), and I don't see how else they could
work.  I have
avoided using BIOS raid because the feature of raidframe
that I can
mount one of the disks in any machine and get at it is
comforting for
recovery from problems.


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )