|
List Info
Thread: 3.1 CVS tag question
|
|
| 3.1 CVS tag question |
  United States |
2007-03-31 06:31:18 |
This is confusing.
Which is the PROPER CVS tag to get 3.1-RELEASE and only bug
fixes and
maintenance..Nothing 'new'.
netbsd-3-1-RELEASE
netbsd-3-base
netbsd-3-1
When I use these I get different src code...so I am
confused.
Thanks!
-JD
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  United Kingdom |
2007-03-31 06:51:36 |
J.D. Bronson wrote:
> This is confusing.
> Which is the PROPER CVS tag to get 3.1-RELEASE and only
bug fixes and
> maintenance..Nothing 'new'.
>
> netbsd-3-1-RELEASE
> netbsd-3-base
> netbsd-3-1
>
> When I use these I get different src code...so I am
confused.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -JD
>
You want the netbsd-3-1 branch which is the 3.1 release +
any security
problems or other critical problems pulled up.
See: http:
//www.netbsd.org/Releases/release-map.html
adrian.
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  United States |
2007-03-31 07:05:44 |
At 12:51 PM 3/31/2007 +0100, Adrian Portelli wrote:
>You want the netbsd-3-1 branch which is the 3.1 release
+ any security
>problems or other critical problems pulled up.
>
>See: http:
//www.netbsd.org/Releases/release-map.html
>
>adrian.
Thanks. I did see that. But wondering what 3-1-RELEASE or
3-1-base is?
--
J.D. Bronson
Telecommunications
West Allis Memorial
Switchroom: 414.978.8282
http://www.myspace.com/wr
qz
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  United Kingdom |
2007-03-31 13:03:25 |
J.D. Bronson wrote:
> At 12:51 PM 3/31/2007 +0100, Adrian Portelli wrote:
>
>> You want the netbsd-3-1 branch which is the 3.1
release + any security
>> problems or other critical problems pulled up.
>>
>> See: http:
//www.netbsd.org/Releases/release-map.html
>>
>> adrian.
>
>
> Thanks. I did see that. But wondering what 3-1-RELEASE
or 3-1-base is?
Tags and branches can look very similar in CVS if you aren't
careful.
3-1-RELEASE is a tag for the actual revisions in the formal
release of 3.1.
At this point the netbsd-3-1 branch was branched. There
isn't a
netbsd-3-1-base tag.
Take a look at the following for example:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/param.h
a>
Look at rev 1.211 and then all subsequent commits against
that branch (which
all begin with 1.211.). 1.211.2.14 is the actual version in
the 3.1 release,
there are later commits to that branch (which all begin with
1.211.2.14.).
--
Stephen
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |

|
2007-04-02 01:25:07 |
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:05:44AM -0500, J.D. Bronson
wrote:
> Thanks. I did see that. But wondering what 3-1-RELEASE
or 3-1-base is?
"netbsd-3-1-RELEASE" is the CVS tag for the
sources used to build the
NetBSD 3.1 release.
And "netbsd-3-1-base" is the base tag for the
"netbsd-3-1" branch
which contains the security fix for NetBSD 3.1. The sources
in
that branch will eventually get released as NetBSD 3.1.1.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  United States |
2007-04-02 06:19:12 |
At 01:25 AM 04/02/2007, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>"netbsd-3-1-RELEASE" is the CVS tag for the
sources used to build the
>NetBSD 3.1 release.
>
>And "netbsd-3-1-base" is the base tag for the
"netbsd-3-1" branch
>which contains the security fix for NetBSD 3.1. The
sources in
>that branch will eventually get released as NetBSD
3.1.1.
Well this seems confusing now.
netbsd-3-1
or
netbsd-3-1-base
Or, are these the same? - I installed 3.1 then used
'netbsd-3-1' as
my cvs tag and rebuilt the machine.
It shows:
3.1.0_PATCH NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH (GENERIC.MPACPI)
Which I assume is correct for MAINT branch of 3.1
-JD
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  Belgium |
2007-04-02 06:41:09 |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:19:12AM -0500, J.D. Bronson
wrote:
> At 01:25 AM 04/02/2007, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> >"netbsd-3-1-RELEASE" is the CVS tag for
the sources used to build the
> >NetBSD 3.1 release.
> >
> >And "netbsd-3-1-base" is the base tag for
the "netbsd-3-1" branch
> >which contains the security fix for NetBSD 3.1. The
sources in
> >that branch will eventually get released as NetBSD
3.1.1.
>
> Well this seems confusing now.
>
> netbsd-3-1
> or
> netbsd-3-1-base
netbsd-3-1-base doesn't exist. -base is used for the tag
where pre-release
branches (like netbsd-3, netbsd-4) are branched (i.e.,
netbsd-3-base was the
starting point for NetBSD-3.0_BETA, and the branch netbsd-3
was created
there). netbsd-3-1 is branched at (not before) the 3.1
release, thus at
netbsd-3-1-RELEASE, not netbsd-3-1-base (which doesn't
exist).
Geert
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  United Kingdom |
2007-04-02 06:42:37 |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:19:12AM -0500, J.D. Bronson
wrote:
> netbsd-3-1
> or
> netbsd-3-1-base
>
> Or, are these the same?
No. "netbsd-3.1" is NetBSD 3.1.x branch.
"netbsd-3-1-base" is the tag which
marks where the "netbsd-3-1" branch was created.
> It shows:
> 3.1.0_PATCH NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH (GENERIC.MPACPI)
>
> Which I assume is correct for MAINT branch of 3.1
Yes, it is.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  Belgium |
2007-04-02 07:00:35 |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Matthias Scheler
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:19:12AM -0500, J.D. Bronson
wrote:
> > netbsd-3-1
> > or
> > netbsd-3-1-base
> >
> > Or, are these the same?
>
> No. "netbsd-3.1" is NetBSD 3.1.x branch.
"netbsd-3-1-base" is the tag which
> marks where the "netbsd-3-1" branch was
created.
No, netbsd-3-1-RELEASE is the base tag for the netbsd-3-1
branch.
Geert
|
|
| Re: 3.1 CVS tag question |
  Poland |
2007-04-02 05:07:18 |
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:00:35 +0200
Geert Hendrickx <ghen telenet.be> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Matthias
Scheler wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:19:12AM -0500, J.D.
Bronson wrote:
> > > netbsd-3-1
> > > or
> > > netbsd-3-1-base
> > >
> > > Or, are these the same?
> >
> > No. "netbsd-3.1" is NetBSD 3.1.x branch.
"netbsd-3-1-base" is the
> > tag which marks where the "netbsd-3-1"
branch was created.
>
> No, netbsd-3-1-RELEASE is the base tag for the
netbsd-3-1 branch.
>
> Geert
Great!
What to say about fresh user without much unix
background...
Excellent example of rocket science where simple sling would
suffice.
Thank you Gentlemen. It's high time to think the NetBSD
over.
Regards,
pp
--
Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp kv.net.pl>
|
|
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|