List Info

Thread: acpidump , well, dump...




acpidump , well, dump...
user name
2007-06-10 08:20:58
Hi,

I don't know if it's worth a send-pr; this has been on my
laptop for a
while. Running acpidump gives:

...
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xbbb05b7b in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
(gdb) bt
#0  0xbbb05b7b in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
#1  0xbbba5ea4 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
#2  0xbbb68d4e in __assert13 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
#3  0x0804c3fa in asl_dump_defif (dpp=0xbfbfe2c8, indent=4)
at asl_dump.c:1046
#4  0x0804de29 in asl_dump_termobj (dpp=0xbfbfe314,
indent=4) at asl_dump.c:1608
#5  0x0804df13 in asl_dump_objectlist (dpp=0xbfbfe33c,
end=0xbbad4126
"[2027C141b_ADRv", indent=4) at
asl_dump.c:1645
#6  0x0804b875 in asl_dump_defmethod (dpp=0xbfbfe398,
indent=3) at
asl_dump.c:688
#7  0x0804c8a6 in asl_dump_termobj (dpp=0xbfbfe3e4,
indent=3) at asl_dump.c:1202
#8  0x0804df13 in asl_dump_objectlist (dpp=0xbfbfe410,
end=0xbbad435a
"2427\C12E01\/03_SB_C002C12Eh2426\C132&q
uot;, indent=3) at
asl_dump.c:1645
#9  0x0804a248 in asl_dump_defscope (dpp=0xbfbfe468,
indent=2) at asl_dump.c:234
#10 0x0804c861 in asl_dump_termobj (dpp=0xbfbfe4b4,
indent=2) at asl_dump.c:1193
#11 0x0804df13 in asl_dump_objectlist (dpp=0xbfbfe4e0,
end=0xbbad7100
"bC1AF22t0222F04rn01fÿÿÿÿfÿÿÿÿn01fÿÿÿÿn&quo
t;,
indent=2) at asl_dump.c:1645
#12 0x0804bfa4 in asl_dump_defdevice (dpp=0xbfbfe538,
indent=1) at
asl_dump.c:922
#13 0x0804ce3f in asl_dump_termobj (dpp=0xbfbfe584,
indent=1) at asl_dump.c:1319
#14 0x0804df13 in asl_dump_objectlist (dpp=0xbfbfe5b0,
end=0xbbadf804
"20LÉ\_TZ_bC30522M060422360222r05
v¬05n",
indent=1) at asl_dump.c:1645
#15 0x0804a248 in asl_dump_defscope (dpp=0xbfbfe608,
indent=0) at asl_dump.c:234
#16 0x0804c861 in asl_dump_termobj (dpp=0xbfbfe654,
indent=0) at asl_dump.c:1193
#17 0x0804df13 in asl_dump_objectlist (dpp=0xbfbfe680,
end=0xbbae169e
"SSDT&03", indent=0) at asl_dump.c:1645
#18 0x08048fc2 in acpi_dump_dsdt (dp=0xbbad1ae4
"bC000n",
end=0xbbae169e "SSDT&03") at acpi.c:175
#19 0x08048e0d in acpi_handle_dsdt (dsdp=0xbbad1ac0) at
acpi.c:116
#20 0x08048e6e in acpi_handle_facp (facp=0xbbae2624) at
acpi.c:128
#21 0x080498a5 in acpi_handle_rsdt (rsdp=0xbbae2778) at
acpi.c:355
#22 0x0804e093 in asl_dump_from_devmem () at acpidump.c:72
#23 0x0804e1bb in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbfe7e8) at
acpidump.c:111
(gdb)

The same in one other assert as well.

The patch:

--- usr.sbin/acpitools/acpidump/asl_dump.c,orig 2007-06-10
14:59:06.000000000 +0100
+++ usr.sbin/acpitools/acpidump/asl_dump.c      2007-02-20
12:49:56.000000000 +0000
 -690,7
+690,7 
         print_indent(indent);
         printf("}");

-        assert(dp == end);
+        /* assert(dp == end); */
         ASL_LEAVE_SCOPE(oname);
         *dpp = dp;
 }
 -1043,7
+1043,7 
         print_indent(indent);
         printf("}");

-        assert(dp == end);
+        /* assert(dp == end); */

         *dpp = dp;
 }

sorts me out, the output appears to be correct, although I
realize the
asserts must have been put there for a reason. My guess is
some
peculiarity of the ACPI implementation of my laptop, an HP
nx6310.

% uname -a
NetBSD lisa 4.99.20 NetBSD 4.99.20 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Wed Jun 
6
18:54:40 BST 2007
rootloan8:/f/obj/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
i386

Chavdar Ivanov


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )