Re: 3.1 CVS tag question

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:37:45 +0200
Geert Hendrickx <ghentelenet.be> wrote:

> So, you don't understand it implies it's broken?
No, I do understand "it's broken". But dunno
"what is broken". Please,
stay aside for a while and walk thru your yes, no, yes, no,
yes, no...
once more.

> It's actually very easy; each branch starts with a
certain tag;
> netbsd-x-base tags (on HEAD) for netbsd-x major
branches and
> netbsd-x-y-RELEASE tags (on those major branches) for
netbsd-x-y
> security branches.  No magic involved, and it works
very well for us
> (releng) as well as other users.

That's right, for 500- users. Not more. The core of the row
is
contained in the three words "for us (releng)".
What I read: first _we_
(releng), then _you_ infidels (that is to say
"users").

Regards,
pp

--
Przemysław Pawełczyk <ppkv.net.pl>

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 07:58:11AM -0500, Przemys?aw
Pawe?czyk wrote:
> That's right, for 500- users. Not more. The core of the
row is contained
> in the three words "for us (releng)". What I
read: first _we_ (releng),
> then _you_ infidels (that is to say
"users").

Oh, right, release tag conventions should fit _your_ ideas,
not releng's.
We're just the ones doing all the work, which doesn't matter
much anyway.

Let me suggest you to create your own fork and leave us
alone with our
b0rken documentation and release systems.

	Geert