List Info

Thread: FAQ section for features reported as bugs?




FAQ section for features reported as bugs?
country flaguser name
Canada
2007-10-13 23:52:07
Hi all,

I was having a look through the general FAQ, and wondered
what people
thought about adding a section to deal with questions about
features
that are sometimes misconstrued as bugs.  Or to borrow from
the Perl
documentation's phrase, that are "traps for the
unwary".

A case in point: I was doing some testing with a serial
console, and
rebooted the machine that the console was directed to,
finding myself
in the kernel debugger when I next checked the target
machine.  Being a
serial console neophyte, I wondered if this was a bug, so I
searched the
PRs and found these:

http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?nu
mber=17919
http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?nu
mber=36884

Something like this could just as easily go under the
existing "common
(and less common) problems" section, but I wondered if
there was some
value to having an explicit listing of items sometimes
reported as bugs
that are no such thing.  I've seen other projects that do
this.  (There
could be a link to this list on the bug reporting
instructions too.)

Regards,

Dave



Re: FAQ section for features reported as bugs?
country flaguser name
Germany
2007-10-14 11:11:51
David H. Gutteridge wrote:

> I wondered if there
> was some value to having an explicit listing of items
sometimes
> reported as bugs that are no such thing.  

Absolute - a very good idea! Please do it.


best regards, Mark

-- 
Mark Weinem
Jabber: weinemjabber.cz

Re: FAQ section for features reported as bugs?
user name
2007-11-04 08:42:01
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:52:07AM -0400, David H.
Gutteridge wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was having a look through the general FAQ, and
wondered what people
> thought about adding a section to deal with questions
about features
> that are sometimes misconstrued as bugs.  Or to borrow
from the Perl
> documentation's phrase, that are "traps for the
unwary".
> 
> A case in point: I was doing some testing with a serial
console, and
> rebooted the machine that the console was directed to,
finding myself
> in the kernel debugger when I next checked the target
machine.  Being a
> serial console neophyte, I wondered if this was a bug,
so I searched the
> PRs and found these:
> 
> http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?nu
mber=17919
> http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?nu
mber=36884

There is already http://www.netbsd.org/ports/sparc/faq.html#serial-unplug


[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )